Week 6 Blog

For my blog this week, I decided to focus on Homo Floresiensis and how the discovery and study of them, have further expanded my insight on human evolution. The Homo Floresiensis are from an island in Indonesia called Flores. H. Floresiensis lived approximately 100,000 to 50,000 years ago. A fact that I found interesting about H. Floresiensis, was that they were extremely small in stature, only standing about 3 feet tall. Due to their short stature, we see that they had a relatively smaller brain size as well compared to Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens living around the same time period as them. Although they had smaller brains, the Homo Floresiensis’ were still able to use stone tools and there is evidence pointing to the hunting of other animals. Which leads me to believe that since H. Florensiensis was confined to an island isolated from the mainland, there was a highly competitive nature for resources.

I found it interesting how, although, Homo Floresiensis was isolated from the mainland and was located on an island, how they were still able to develop and use stone tools. It had never crossed my mind that isolated communities, especially hundreds of thousands of years ago, were able to use their resources around them to form stone tools, and even, from what we know, hunt other animals. Though, it makes sense in order for the species to have survived and developed throughout time.

The reason that we are able to know so much about Homo Florensiensis, is due to the study of the fossil remains of the species. Despite their small stature, they were, in fact, bipedal. This species was known for having an absence of a chin, thick leg bones, and having a relatively low twist of the arm bones. This leads me to believe that the low twist could infer walking. Though, since they were short in stature, they wouldn’t be able to walk as much as modern-day humans, so they could still use their arms to walk on all fours. Another interesting fact was that Homo Florensiensis had their knee caps further back compared to nowadays. Which, again, I would correlate to the shorter distances of walking, though, walking had been developed as an evolutionary trait at that point in time.

Overall, the biggest contribution from finding these fossils remains is the amount of expanded knowledge that we now know of. If we did not have paleoanthropologists, this entire species may have gone unnoticed and undiscovered. It is crucial that we, as a society, desire to further our knowledge of our evolutionary traits and where we came from and how we developed as a species. Human diversity has allowed us to use fossil remains of ancestors in order to find the evolutionary differences of different species in different parts of the world, in order to acknowledge why we act, think, and look like we do nowadays. These discoveries also allowed us, as humans, to realize that if we truly put our minds to something, that anything is possible and plausible, and that every single thing in the universe has an explanation.

One thought on “Week 6 Blog

  1. Hey Megan! Prior to this class, I had no idea that Homo floresiensis, among some of the other species (besides the genus Homo and Neanderthals), existed. But learning about what makes them unique – which is most of their traits – taught me a lot about evolution and variation. It seems surreal to learn about hominins that were about 3 feet tall, were surrounded by dwarf elephants and gigantic komodo dragons, had tiny chimp brains, but used tools. I also agree that it does make sense that they would use these tools given these other creatures on the island, as well as it was probably a pretty competitive environment. It is just amazing to think that they existed at the same time as us, as well as potentially Neanderthals. Their very existence was mind-boggling. It makes me question what brings about tool use, meaning is big brains solely necessary for such an activity. Many of the hominins we learned about could not make and use tools, or at least at most basic ones, and those that could had larger brains. Is it then because they were sort of forced to adapt or die that they made tools or is it other features of the time and environment that made them do so? And although it is groundbreaking to hear about Neanderthals in regard to their similarity to us, functionality, and that they lived not that long ago, hearing about H. floresiensis living at a similar time on the other side of the world that was so different seems almost more.

Leave a Reply