The theory surrounding the idea of aliens or technologically advanced societies is a very interesting topic to to discuss, especially reviewing all of the unsupported claims made on them. If these statements, in hindsight, were verifiable, the archaeological record for them would be nothing of what it actually looks like in the present day. The archaeological records would not have the ability to show the true methods of how these pyramids were actually constructed, along with also not showing evidence of any of the first smaller structures and the way that the pyramid structures evolved with time. The progression would be non-existent and instead the archaeological records would show the instantaneous construction of pyramids without the evolution of pyramids in total.
The Atlantean hyper-diffusion idea is equally as interesting on the topic of unsupported claims. If multiple civilizations spewed from the technologically advanced Utopian society, there would be evidence within the societies that spewed from them that showed that this advanced society existed at all. Instead what is shown is that the societies that spewed from the Atlantean civilization have regressed instead of progressed, or even maintained some of the same technologies that the Atlanteans apparently possessed.
One thought on “Alien Vs. Egyptian (and others)”
Comments are closed.
I agree that if Aliens created the Pyramids there would be no evidence of previous pyramid building. If the Aliens, or any other extraterrestrial force had a hand in the building of the pyramids, then the records would show they just appeared. Archaeological records would also not show how the Egyptians had their own site set up for the workers. There would be no need to house, or let alone have, workers in the Aliens built the Pyramids. Along with the work site, there would be no need for the ramp system archaeologist have recently discovered. Aliens would have superior technology and would not have used a simple ramp to get the job done. The material the pyramids were made out of themselves would not make sense either. With such technology, wouldn’t the Aliens use a material stronger than limestone for the production of the Pyramids? Same goes for your point on the Atlantean society. I agree that the Egyptians and the Mayan would not have shown regression if they derived from Atlantis. It wouldn’t make sense that the Egyptians figured out how to make and write on paper, but the Mayan and other civilization did not. If they all came from an advanced civilization, then there would be clear archaeological findings of advanced technologies in the later societies. Not to mention that the structures created by the Egyptians and the Mayans may have looked similar, but served completely different functions. The Egyptian pyramids were used as burial tombs, while the Mayan ones were for religious purpose. If both societies derived from one common society, then the functions of the Pyramids would be identical and not vastly different.